Saturday, April 6, 2024

Battle of Fornovo 1495

After four games of the 1497 Battle of Sanguetta, I cleared the table and laid out a second, Great Italian Wars battle.  This time, the battle selected is the 1495 Battle of Fornovo.  Again, RM Verginella's recent scenario book was used as a guide and inspiration but I found the scenario needed some adjustments to fall in line with my understanding of the battle and the units present.
Anyway, I had five players present for the first playing of the scenario with Chris, Tony, and Mark taking Italian commands while the Two Daves split the French command between them.  The initial battle deployments and commands are illustrated in the photo below:
Battlefield deployments.
The Taro River separates The Italian League from the French Army.  A heavy rain the day before and continued rain on the day of battle sees the Taro River rising to flood stage in parts.  There are only three places at which the Italians can cross to engage the French.  Gonzaga must act quickly before even the fords are impassable. 

While the Italians outnumber the French, fording the river to engage the enemy poses challenges.  Let's see how the Italians dealt with this challenge.

With the Italians holding initiative on the first impulse, Gonzaga activitates his Right Wing under the command of Caiazzo.  Caiazzo wastes no time in bringing his light cavalry on the French side of the Taro into battle.  The Stradiots drive off the enemy bowmen as Caiazzo brings his Men-at-Arms (MAA) across the ford.  Note that the Italians may place one unit in each of the three fords before the battle begins. Trotting out from the river, Caiazzo leads his MAA into the remaining bowmen to his front.  The skirmishers fail to evade and are overrun.  Caiazzo does not pursue.
Stradiots drive off enemy skirmishers.
Caiazzo's MAA cross the ford and straight into the enemy.
Caiazzo's MAA overrun a second group of skirmishers.
In response to the sudden attacks against the French Left, de Gie jumps into action.  At the head of his Gendarmes, de Gie passes through his artillery and slams into Caiazzo and his MAA.  Surprised by the attack from this direction, Caiazzo recoils back to the river's edge.  Disordered, de Gie pursues the Italians.  In the second clash, not only are Caiazzo and his MAA driven back across the Taro but the Stradiots are forced to fall back as well. 
de Gie attacks...
and Caiazzo recoils!
In pursuit, Caiazzo and his MAA flee back across the Taro.
With such success, de Gie has advanced beyond his support as Italian mounted crossbowmen slip across the river behind him.  De Montone's pike block on the Italian Left wades across the river too as the Italians attempt to form a bridgehead on the French side of the Taro. 
The Italians begin to cross the Taro.
To open up the left ford, de Montone sends his pike block in against the enemy center.  King Charles, himself, and his Gendarmes are the targets.  The King does not give ground in the initial clash.  The pikemen are forced back.  Perhaps the attack of the pikemen was only a diversion?  As soon as the pike block clears the front, de Montone leads his MAA in against the King's Horsemen.  In a protracted melee, de Montone finally and grudgingly gives ground.  The King does not pursue. 
The King repulses the enemy attack.
De Montone attacks the King!
After hard fighting, losses mount... 
but de Montone is forced back.
Back on the French Left, the marauding Stradiots spot de Gie and his Gendarmes in the open far from any support.  They pounce!  Weakened from his earlier efforts against Caiazzo, this attack, from a direction unexpected, causes the Gendarmes to turn about and head toward support.  Unfortunately, the Stradiots pursue and overtake these lumbering horsemen.  The French Gendarmes are scattered as de Gie seeks the safety with the Swiss pike.
De Gie's Gendarmes are caught...
pursued and destroyed!
On the French Right, the remaining unengaged French Gendarmes move against the defenders of the leftmost ford.  Initially driven off by a body of Italian crossbow, the Gendarmes regroup and attack a second time.  For them, the second time is a charm and the enemy crossbow buckle and run.  While the Gendarmes do not pursue, they do turn to face the enemy MAA.  The Italian Left may be hanging unsupported.
Gendarmes attacking the ford!
With the King gaining the initiative, the Gendarmes pick up where they left off. De Montone's MAA are attacked viciously from the flank and are dispersed.  De Montone is left dying on the field.    
De Montone hit in the flank!
De Montone is killed and his MAA scattered.
While it appears that the French have gained the upper hand in this fight, trouble is brewing elsewhere.

On the French Left, with de Gie's Gendarmes gone, the massive Swiss pike block finds itself now isolated.  Hemmed in by enemy MAA, crossbow, and Stradiots, the Swiss need to extricate themselves from this tight spot.  Attacked from both crossbow and Stradiots, the Swiss give ground slowly as they turn to face the enemy. 
The Swiss look isolated...
Jumping to the fight in the center, with their backs to the Taro and French Gendarmes on their flank, de Montone's pike block figures attacking away from the river is much better than staying put.  They advance against French crossbow but the hail of bolts sends the pikemen back toward the river.   
De Montone's pike attack...
but are sent back to the river having gained nothing.
Gonzaga, with his cavalry and skirmishers across the river, attacks the Swiss.  Softened up by missile fire from both skirmishers and mounted crossbow, Gonzaga and his Familia Ducale strike.  With heavy loss, the Swiss are forced back as harassing attacks come from the Stradiots as well.  The Swiss find themselves pinned against the steep hills to their rear.  
Much of Gonzaga's Center is across the Taro.
The Swiss are attacked...
and driven back to the base of the steep hills.
With the French Left under great pressure, the King presses on in an attempt to turn the Italian Left.  After enduring a barrage of crossbow bolts, the remnants of de Montone's pike block succumbs to the attack of French Gendarmes.  The Italian Left has been destroyed.  Still, the battle hangs in the balance as the French Army teeters on collapse.
De Montone's pike are destroyed!
Seeing the French Left in tatters, Caiazzo finally brings his pike block across the Taro.  It marches away from the ford to finish off the Swiss.
Caiazzo's pike march to seal off the French retreat.
While the Italian Left has completely collapsed, the Italian Center and Right have positioned themselves well.  Guessing that the French Army is on the verge of collapse, itself, Gonzaga plans one last charge with his heavy cavalry against the King's depleted Gendarmes.  In preparation for the attack, mounted crossbowmen move up to pepper the King.  Gonzaga needs not attack at all!  Effective crossbow shooting is enough to break the King's Gendarmes.  They flee the battlefield, taking the King with them. 
Crossbow shooting breaks the King's Gendarmes!
With the loss of the King's Gendarmes, the French have endured more than enough.  The French Army breaks and Gonzaga and his Italians are victorious.  For Gonzaga, it was a near-run thing. 
The battle is over.
What a terrific battle!  Fortunes swung to and fro throughout and it was not over until it was over.  The loss of two bodies of France’s finest Gendarmes helped to push the King over the breaking point.

Congratulations to the Italians (Tony, Mark, and Chris) in their battle against their worthy, French adversaries (The Two Daves).  The battle was hard-fought by all and in a new twist, we all witnessed Dave C. actually throw some decent dice for once!  Without those unexpected, good fortunes, the Italian Left may have held its own.  This was not to be!

Very enjoyable contest that I will remember for a long time.

Thanks, everyone for fighting such a good fight.

71 comments:

  1. Another great looking battle Jon and perhaps a surprise result, seems so unlikely that the Italians can win from their starting position !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Matt! Since, historically, both armies claimed victory on the day, the Italians ought to have a fair chance despite their questionable starting positions.

      Delete
  2. What a terrific battle and congratulations are due to the commanders on both sides for another tight game.
    I found the bigger game harder to follow but this just means I ought to give it more time and attention than just one read through. The crossbowmen seem to have had a good day.
    Stephen

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stephen, the battle was hard-fought throughout with local successes and local failures across the battlefield and spanning the length of the contest. Great fun to watch but sorry to see that it was difficult to follow. That falls upon me, as author, since I tended to jump from wing to wing as the battle unfolded.

      Delete
  3. Thanks for a very colourful report of a grand looking game. I am happy for Dave.C as well. It is always a joy when the dice relent and roll your way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very colorful, indeed! We were (even his enemies!) all happy to see DC's luck turn-around in this game. He has suffered long enough.

      Delete
    2. Thanks guys. I suspect normal service will be resumed very soon but it was nice to have my moment of dice glory.

      Delete
    3. The change, if even briefly, was welcomed by everyone.

      Delete
  4. An inspiring battle and very impressive, must look at this again when I get my new streams.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, George! I look forward to seeing your interpretation of this battle.

      Delete
  5. A fine game and AAR there Jon! Fascinating to see the game unfold and compare to the 15 minutes of the actual battle. When I read Oman I wondered how the French won, but the actions of the Italians (or lack there of) and the fact that they were fighting a previous war in terms of tactics, gave me the answer. In a way it reminded my of France 1940 and one side fighting the last war in terms of tactics, the other new ones and the difference it made, plus of course much better C&C too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's probably better to ignore Oman for this battle. He didn't like condottiere tactics and rather over-egged the "modernity" of the French. Modern reconstructions are more balanced. C&C was the big problem for the Italians - it was not a cohesive army but an alliance. The consequences of losing were higher for the French too, which must have been a strong motivator.

      Delete
    2. Thank you, Steve! Since both armies claimed victory, each may have been pursuing their own definition of what constituted a victory.

      Delete
    3. Anthony, thanks for your insights. At least one account I read stated that this was the last truly Medieval battle fought. From the Italian side, it certainly looked positively Medieval.

      Delete
  6. Jonathan, nice eye candy.
    OoB for Fornovo are problematic. I've seen references to Landesknecht pike on the Italian side and different numbers of French infantry on the other, so it looks as if there isn't a lot of detail.
    Personally, I'm not convinced by the large numbers of Italian pike. My reading suggests the Italians were slow to take up the pike, with Venice and the Papacy fielding significant numbers by the 1500s - notably from the recruiting grounds of the Romagna.
    This early, with an army relying on Condotiere, I'd expect mostly crossbows and possibly spears / halberds /glaives possibly with shields for the infantry. Certainly, there seems to have been little expected of them with the MAA being the main strike force.
    That said, a lot of Italian wargames authors give Italian armies pike from early in the period.
    Neil

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While i agree about the Italian infantry, Jon only has the figures he has, which are from 20 or more years after this battle. The main thing is how they were rated as combatants. The Italian infantry here were numerous but not very good - their strength was in their cavalry.

      Delete
    2. Anthony, not criticising Jon's use of figures; in point of fact the scenario booklet classes the Italian infantry as mostly pike! It's interesting that Italian authors (Impetus for example) give Italian armies pikes quite early. I wonder if we are dealing with spears v pikes; how long does a spear have to be before it's a pike?
      Neil

      Delete
    3. Interesting about the scenario book. The Italians certainly used lanze longhe in the 15th century and illustrations would suggest they were similar in length to Swiss pikes. The famous engravings of the battle though show infantry with traditional oval shields and partizans. I think most infantry would still have been the mixed shielded and long lance in front and crossbows behind and shallower than pikes.

      Delete
    4. Superb and very informative discussion, Neil and Anthony! I should have consulted you two for OB details.

      For the French infantry masses, I fielded them much as Anthony suggests despite Verginella's OB. That is one stand of pike with a supporting stand of crossbow. Perhaps I should have treated the Italian Cernie Squares similarly?

      Interesting that you both note that Italian authors (including Verginella and Sartori-Impetvs) show Italians fielding pike blocks earlier than expected. That is very interesting. What do you suppose drives that national tendency?

      Thank you both for expanding my knowledge and the discussion!

      Delete
    5. The latest book I have on the battle is Predonzani & Alberici The Italian Wars Vol. 1 . (2019) Both authors are based in Italy and discuss the nature of the Italian infantry at the battle. They note one contemporary mention of pikes but tend to believe the infantry were traditionally Italian - shields forward, supported by lanze longhe/pikes and rotella equipped light infantry, crossbows and handguns. I'm not sure that the Italians by this stage were using their pikes en bloc like the Swiss.

      Delete
    6. Good information, Anthony. One contemporary account of Italian pikes is a start. As you mentioned earlier, I go to battle with the armies I’ve painted not necessarily the proper ones.

      Delete
    7. There's clearly two aspects - the figures that Jon has and the historical armies. Jon's collection clearly provides a great game and provides the Italians with a chance which the historical armies wouldn't. I seem to recall that the Swiss started with 10 foot pikes and changed to longer ones. I think the Italian infantry with spears, glaves, etc possibly go through a similar transition but the problem, as demonstrated by the Scots at Flodden, is the training and discipline required to use the pike properly. I'd certainly rate Italian pikes as poorer than Swiss or Landsknecht and on a pare with French. At Ravenna, one of the bodies of French infantry is about 1/3 pike possibly illustrates the trend. Another great game Jon.

      Delete
    8. Brian, thanks for weighing in. In the game, the Italian pikes are, indeed, rated poorer than the Swiss or Landsknechts. Much poorer, really.

      Delete
    9. A bit of further information on Italian pike: George Gush gives the name of this Condotta as responsible for the introduction of pike armed Italians:

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitellozzo_Vitelli

      Neil

      Delete
    10. Vitelli seems an old friend. He was the Orsini commander in my recent run of Sanguetta battles.

      Delete
  7. Very interesting, at first I thought that the Italians had it too easy by starting on the ford …. But by the end of play, the too and fro and tightness of the game suggests not - good game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The battle turned out to be a very closely fought action. I reckon all players enjoyed the fight.

      Delete
  8. Another great looking battle and a good read. The battle certainly swung to and fro and a good win for the Italians.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Donnie! Happy to see that you could follow the narrative and enjoyed it.

      Delete
  9. Jon, how did you handle the weather effects? Raining on the day, rising water levels in the Taro?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For weather effects, I downgraded artillery effectiveness. For the rising Taro, on Turns 1-3, the fords were considered Broken ground. From Turns 4+, the fords were considered Difficult and each unit exiting a ford had a 50% chance of actually making it to the other side. The Italians were forced into getting their army to the other side as quickly as possible. Charging and pursuing was more difficult as well.

      Delete
  10. Splendid looking and much more successful version of the battle than mine! Nicely balanced going into the final straight! My understanding was that the Italians were slightly later in their adoption of the pike, with Caesera Borgia a notable exception, but it's a transisitional period and we can't field all the options I feel, as long as it's colourful and gives an impression of the period I would be happy and yours delivers in spades!
    Best Iain caveadsum1471

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Iain! As for army configurations, I took a shot at it based upon resources at hand and within the Impetvs Lists. Looks like there may be room for improvements.

      Delete
  11. Fantastic game and great looking armies

    ReplyDelete
  12. Splendid game and report Jonathan, most enjoyable.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Barnstormer of a game that I initially didn’t think we stood a chance of winning. The scenario was very well thought through and quite a challenge. Fantastic to see Dave C with working dice for once - even though he was the opposition. Probably wouldn’t thave been so chuffed if he’d been on my flank of the battlefield. Looking forward to refighting this on Monday!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The game was a barnstormer, for sure. Great fun too! Yeah, Chris may have a very different take on DC's new-found success with the dice.
      I appreciate your encouragement on the game design and your participation. I look forward to Monday's clash as well.

      Delete
    2. Damned right I have a different take on New Dave 😆.
      To be honest I can’t say Dave was particularly lucky. He managed to assemble a great arc of shot around the units I had on his side of the river, and shot me to bits. I should have gone for the gendarmes again instead of those crossbow men.
      Great AAR. Nice to see close ups of the figures.

      Delete
    3. I think Dave's dice rolling was not HORRIBLE this time which made his average rolls seem GREAT.

      Glad enjoyed both game and BatRep!

      Delete
  14. Superb looking table and figures, and as always, a detailed and engaging account...great stuff Jon and worth the slightly delayed match coverage!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Keith! Very good to see it was worth the wait.

      Delete
  15. Must be honest here - if my good friend de Montone had not persuaded me otherwise, I'd have charged the King's Gendarmes at the end, and would probably have lost the battle as a result. Fortunately I was talked into shooting at them with crossbows instead (they can't throw them back), and was lucky enough to score the hit necessary to swing the result. Another great game, and a fine report; this was the closest finish to a BI game I've been involved in! I'm still very surprised the Italians won - we didn't seem to be doing particularly well early on!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This was a game that saw much drama as the two armies fought it out as if in a prize fight. Scoring a hit with your crossbowmen was all that was needed to send the Gendarmes, The King, and his army packing. This was really a very close decision. The result could have gone another way, easily.

      As Gonzaga, you led your coalition to a well-earned victory. Congratulations!

      Delete
  16. Many thanks Jon , a great report of a really tremendous game! I admit that as poor old de Gie it felt like a tough gig, I seemed to be outnumbered 2 to 1 and surrounded by those pesky Stradiots, buzzing like a load of angry wasps! My own light cavalry got chased off on turn one - the Gens D'Armes did their best but I let them get ahead of any support, oh dear! Full credit to the other players, they were great and 'The King' Dave C so nearly saved us!
    Thanks again Jon for a great evening, as ever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are most welcome, David! You are right that the Stradiots were swarming your wing relentlessly. With your light cavalry gone, you had no means to counter that nuisance. Mark is very cagey anyway. He would have found another means to torment you.

      Great fun as always and thank you for taking a command!

      Delete
  17. A most enjoyable read where the advantage seems to swing from one army to another right until the end.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Peter! Players may feel like they are winning when they are active and losing when the enemy is active. The trick is knowing when to hold something back in anticipation of the enemy’s activation.

      Delete
  18. Another fine AAR, lots of fine action. Great comments on the situation and the various mechanisms for showing troop types. There was the best use and results from stradiots as a unit type , I never get such outcomes . I smiled about the dice turning toward one player, it is always good when it happens. Jonathan, explaining the happenings of events in a large game is always problematic. You did a good job with this one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Joe! I appreciate you coming to my defense. Reader commentary is often very enlightening as well as encouraging.

      Delete
    2. Jon - you do an amazing job in describing the action in your games. And managing to take photos while keeping players on the straight and narrow! And the discussion that the AARs spur is a definite bonus.

      Delete
    3. Thank you, Brian! Double thumbs up to you! I wager that after Stephen has played the scenario and then comes back to read this account, it makes much more sense.

      Delete
  19. A great looking game during a fantastic period...Superb!

    ReplyDelete
  20. A great looking game Jon. Looking forward to trying this out myself on Monday!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Splendid stuff Jonathan…
    What a top game and a very enjoyable AAR…

    All the best. Aly

    ReplyDelete
  22. Excellent looking game and AAR...I'm looking forward to giving this a try tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Lee! I look forward to Monday's game as well.

      Delete
  23. Good AAR, I appreciate all the arrows and such.
    I though the Itals would have a harder time crossing the river, turns out to be just hard enough...
    Seemed liek everyone enjoyed it form the comments above, so that always a sign of a good game. 😁

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Stew! The river was just hard enough. In Game #2 with a buddy on Saturday, the Taro became a real obstacle for him as the Italians. Game #3 on deck in a couple of hours.

      From my experience, player commentary is always very polite and encouraging despite the outcome.

      Delete
    2. yeah, the OUTCOME. most gamers don;t care about teh actual outcome; winner or loser. we ain't playing for money or spoils. but if the scenario is wonky or really one sided then they'll let you know. 😁

      Delete
  24. Five players is a good number and seems to me pretty much a full house. A lovely looking game Jonathan and worth the wait for the AAR.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Five is the perfect number for this scenario. Glad you enjoyed the game, Lawrence! I have another account to tell at some point.

      Delete
  25. It was a very tense game Jon. I had expected the Italians' crossing of the river to be much more delayed so panicked a little when Caiazzo managed to get his men across so quickly and hammering at de Gie. I was very gratified to see my die rolls improve so markedly - as I think you guys have commented above it wasn't so much that my results were stellar, just that they weren't totally rubbish for a change, which made a massive difference :-D. We seemed to go very abruptly from a situation where we seemed to be in big trouble, to suddenly having the prospect of a serious counter attack, rolling up the Italian line while their remaining units - including a massive pike block in the centre - struggled to cross. And we might have gotten away with it but for those meddling crossbowmen! It's always good when a battle is that close, thanks as always for hosting a brilliant game and congratulations to the Italians for a convincing win!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dave! Great to hear from you! Seeing your fortunes turn around in this battle were cheered by friend and foe alike. Unfortunately, your bad luck passed along to Chris' dice in yesterday's battle and he could not hit the broadside of a barn. Having destroyed the Italian Left, and turned that wing, I really thought you were going to win the battle.

      It was so close and you might have gotten away with victory if not for those meddling crossbowmen!

      Delete