|Rejection Email from BGG|
Such harsh words!
I am a frequent visitor to BoardGameGeek to satisfy all types of boardgaming queries. With few entries for the DTP game, Montcalm & Wolfe for which I am journaling a campaign game, I figured an account of a gaming session would be of interest to the community. Wrong!
As seen from the terse reply, the reasons for rejection were due to three factors. Those factors were:
- 40% Poor Structure
- 20% Irrelevant
- 40% Spam
I wonder what data analytics' algorithm settled on those criteria and percentages for rejection? How could a game replay of the game, itself, be Irrelevant? Does any entry containing a link qualify as Spam? As for Poor Structure, well, I guess debating a topic as subjective as structure is pointless. Sigh...