Monday, August 9, 2021

Shoemaker's Bridge: Game 1

Game 1 of the planned Shoemaker's Bridge battle trilogy kicked off on Tuesday in the weekly MNG remote game.  Being a UK based gaming group, I had some difficulty finding a volunteer for the American command.  Gladly, Richard stepped forward to take command of the Rebels.  With only three players in attendance, Richard would command the Rebels alone.  It is a lonely fight, for sure.  Ian and Will took charge of the British forces on the day of battle.

The battle began innocently enough with the Americans deployed to cover the approaches to Shoemaker's Bridge.  Heard's Brigade of militia, a regiment of Continental Rifles, and a section of guns were the only speed bump to the numerous, oncoming Redcoats.  Help would be on the way or so Heard hoped.

The white cotton ball denotes First Fire capability while the red disk identifies a unit as being on HOLD orders.  Units under HOLD orders may respond during the enemy's turn. 

The Rebels wait
and wait for what they expect to see advancing up the road.

The Rebels need not wait long.

Matthews leading the two Guard battalions and Jones leading the 10th, 37th, and 38th foot, deploy into line and press on to the stream covering the bridge (Ian's commands).  Pigott and Smith deploy and advance toward Shoemaker's Farm (Will's command).

For the Americans, Nixon and Parson's Brigades begin streaming onto the field of battle from the direction of Brooklyn.

The British army approaches the stream
The British left splashes across the stream
 while the British right prepares to assault the heights. 
The British right wades through the stream
and readies for the attack.
On the left, lead elements of Jones' Brigade engage the rebels in the field as the rebels seek cover behind the fence.  On the right, militia defending Shoemaker's Farm are slowing the British advance upon the heights.  Casualties mount but the numbers and discipline of the British prevails.  The British are upon the heights!
Shoemaker's Hill is under assault!
Redcoats gain a foothold on the heights!
Success is short lived.  On the left, Jones is thrown back from the field while Smith sees a similar response from Shoemaker's Farm.  The British are tumbling back down the hill having suffered heavy casualties.
The British are thrown back!
After regrouping, the British Army launches assaults across its front a second time.  These extra efforts pay off.  The American right is driven back from the field with heavy casualties as the Guard is sent in to finish the task.  On the British right, heavy ranks of redcoats storm the farm.  Shoemaker's Farm falls!
British take Shoemaker's Farm
At this point following three hours of battle, we called the outcome inevitable as the American commander declares he will withdraw.  The ending position looked like this:
Positions at end of game
Clearly, with two separate British commands, the battle divided into almost two separate battles.  On the American right, the position was collapsing quickly once the Guard made its presence felt.  On the American left, the rebels still maintained a defensible position upon the heights.  For how long?  We will never know.

At the end of battle, the Butcher's Bill showed,
Butcher's Bill
Heavy casualties, for sure.  The British lost three regiments to the American's five regiments.  Many more regiments were only one hit away from destruction.  This was a costly battle but one the British may claim as a victory.

For Victory Points, The British tallied 19 points against 13. A tactical victory for the British.  Congratulations to Ian and Will!

Shoemaker's Bridge was a good introduction to Fields of Honor.  The players picked up the mechanisms quickly and play moved along at a respectable pace.  I could see tactics developing as the game progressed.  There was talk about a rematch.  

44 comments:

  1. Good looking game and sounds like it was fun to play out,I will remain non partisan on the result!
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Iain! The game was fun to watch develop, for sure. I reckon I know where allegiances lay...

      Delete
  2. Sorry I missed it. Hopefully I'll be about for round 2!

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Let's do it again." Best kind of game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree! When the players want to tackle the game a second time. That is a good sign.

      Delete
  4. A nice game and scenario Jonathan and a rather bloody win for the British. Will this form the first part of a mini-campaign?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Steve! Not likely to become a mini-campaign but who knows? With multiple replays of this scenario, I may never move beyond Shoemaker's Bridge.

      Delete
  5. A good read and an excellent way to game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you enjoyed it, George! This is a fun way to play and umpire.

      Delete
  6. Now that is an interesting fight. Great to see that it worked so well. The pickup nature of the game, in terms of focusing on the fight rather than flicking through rules, is coming through very clearly too Jon. Great work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is really interesting to me is seeing how different players tackle the same tactical challenge. Your game with Steve was different from this approach but still very similar. I am pleased that you find the game-play clean and effortless. Removing some of the overhead from the gamers' plate opens up new gaming opportunities and focus. I have a friend who says this type of game allows one to focus on the 'X's and 'O's and the objective rather than on the game system minutiae. Thank you.

      Delete
  7. Interesting gaming, Jonathan. I wonder if the sole American player was at a disadvantage having to "generals" to contend with at the same time. I suppose, it could also be favorable having one single overall commander too, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good question, Dean! No other commander to coordinate with but twice as many regiments to command. Which is better?

      Delete
  8. Very interesting to see the ‘Butcher’s Bill’ shot and also to see that the system allows two units in a hex. Does it make the front unit the ‘lead’ unit from which morale and casualties are managed, with the second unit just counting as a support, but sharing retreats etc?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A quick glance shows which commands were doing the real fighting. Jones' command was nearly wiped out.

      For multiple units in one hex, you are exactly right. Lead unit takes the Morale Check but both units contribute to the fighting. The downside is that such a target hex takes a penalty when fired into as a dense hex. One does not want to stack units in one hext unless prepared to assault. It worked well, I thought.

      Delete
    2. Yes, I like those ideas, though from experience I know that it puts a squeeze on terrain and figures c0-existing in the same hex.

      Delete
    3. Two units in one hex can put a squeeze on but I can fit two infantry plus terrain in the hex.

      Delete
  9. Great looking game as always Jonathan!
    Yours reports are pure eye's candies :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Great to see that was a success and that everyone was up for a re-match. I like your 15mm approach to AWI as you can see the formations but without the field becoming overly-cluttered.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the players are willing to give the game another try, that is usually a good sign. Glad you enjoy the look of the game!

      Delete
  11. Very interesting and enjoyable battle report

    ReplyDelete
  12. Great to see the other battle Jon and compare the approaches. As you say the rules work well providing a stimulating battle without focussing too much on the detail. Perhaps there is something in this hex thing ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matt, it was interesting seeing how different players approached the game differently. Quite fascinating, really. There is always more than one way to skin a cat or be skinned.

      Hexes? You?

      Delete
  13. Great read very interesting to be able to compare with the game Matt and I played. Agree with Matt the rules are ideal and the hex approach is really suited to games via Zoom both for play and communicating with the host regards movement etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Comparison is fun and useful, isn't it? Once I make it through summarizing each action, I may collect my thoughts and compare/contrast the different approaches seen in these battles. Hexes seem to work very well for this type of gaming with players not only in different rooms but on different continents!

      Delete
  14. A great looking game Jon and seems like everyone had a share of success at various points . I was going to make the same point as Dean....it can be an advantage to be one player against two, as long as the forces aren't too large...which these dud not seem to be. What dud you think, as umpire, was the American player disadvantaged by flying solo?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Keith! Everyone had a chance to attack and defend although the British were typically doing more attacking and the Americans were doing more defending.

      As for your question on having an advantage/disadvantage based upon number of units or number of commanders, I will ask the American player his thoughts. The American player seemed comfortable moving his 16 units and not once mentioned being overloaded with work. Two players per side would have worked very well, I think.

      Delete
  15. Reads and looks like a good game. Pardon me for being a bit nosy and peering at the pics but do I see some Frontier figs there? Hmm .... after asking, I'm having a bit of daja vue...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was a good game, Ross. You have a good eye! Yes, many of those figures are Frontier Miniatures. The bulk of the remainder are Jeff Valent Miniatures.

      Delete
  16. That's a really good looking battle and the hex style sounds like it's far better suited to a video-game than a measuring-tape style.

    O and, up the Brits!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! The hexes made movement and firing much quicker and eliminated the fiddly bits of measuring.

      Yes, on this day the Brits were victorious.

      Delete
  17. Must of been a good game since I see it on blogs all OVER the internet. 😀
    Nice job! You’ve gotten real good at virtual game hosting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! There were three games last week. I have two more battles for which to tell a tale.

      Delete
  18. A nicely looking game! Interesting to see the rematch :)

    ReplyDelete
  19. It's a shame that I didn't had the time to write a comment. Great game. I love such games with an army devided between two commanders as here with the British. I love the discussions around the table. Great report as always.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andrè, you are never too late to leave a comment. Each comment is welcome regardless of when it arrives.

      Thank you for your continued support.

      Delete
  20. 'Off the blog's for the better part of a couple of months and you have given me loads to catch up on Jonathan! A fine looking first version in what I know, with the benefit of history, was a series!
    Regards, James

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James, great to see you return and with conviction! I appreciate your effort in going back through old posts and especially reading through all of the Shoemaker’s Bridge posts. Yes, this was a fun series. I will likely do something similar again. With so many remote candidates, I expect I could easily fill a few game tables.

      Delete