Wednesday, September 10, 2025

Quistello for Four

Given the close ending to the Quistello game with the Rejects (see Quistello with Rejects Part II), I was curious to see how a different group of players would approach the challenges that the battle (and scenario) offered.  While the Rejects' game ended in an historical outcome with the Allies forced to retire from the field, the battle outcome was much more even than the historical accounts suggest.

For today's game, four players were present to take up arms.  The Two Daves (DB and DC) were relegated to commanding the Franco-Piedmontese (Allied) armies after both Doug and Chris raised their hands first to command the Austrians.  Army and troop dispositions are shown in the table photos below: 
Battlefield with Austrian attack plan.
Army dispositions.
As in the previous battle, the Allies begin the battle encamped with a possibility of being surprised when the Austrians attack in the early morning.
Poised for battle!
Let's see how this quartet handles the battle.

Konigsegg and Wurttemberg's columns (Chris) step off toward the Secchia River without much hesitation.  Those two columns splash across the river above Quistello.  With the two Austrian columns in motion, von Waldeck (Doug) attacks Quistello.  De Contades' (DB) French regiment and artillery deployed in Quistello, itself, is caught by surprise when Austrian grenadiers storm into the village.  Isolated and found in a state of unpreparedness, the French capitulate quickly against overwhelming odds.  The guns are lost in the confusion.  Not a good start for the Allies!   
Austrian grenadiers attack...
clearing Quistello of French!
As Konigsegg works his way across the Secchia above Gaidellina and forms up into line, Neipperg leads two grenadier battalions in against Gaidellina.  De Broglie is surprised but manages to slip away before the weight of the Austrian attack falls upon the defenders.  In a matter of minutes, the Frenchmen are scattered and the grenadiers have taken the farm.  The Austrian grenadiers do not pause to loot.  On they advance into another unsuspecting French regiment encamped to the north.  These poor fellows suffer a similar fate and are scattered to the wind!  Having three French regiments break in quick succession, de Contades' Brigade is wrecked before he can offer much resistance.  Austrian progress is slowed as de Bonas (DC) brings up his cavalry and de Broglie brings up one of de Contades' regiments to plug a gap.        
Austrian grenadiers clear out Gaidellina...
Konigsegg crosses the Secchia.
de Contades' Brigade is wrecked!
Konigsegg pushes on...
giving the French cavalry a crippling volley.
In the center, one of de Contade's regiments falls back along the road with an artillery battery joining up.  De Contades, himself, rides over to his left to encourage his troops guarding the river where the enemy prepares to cross.  Von Waldeck brings infantry both across the bridge at Quistello and prepares a frontal assault downstream into de Contades' waiting men.
French fall back from the river in the center...
while von Waldeck's Austrians press on.
von Waldeck readies his assault.
Battle overview.
While cavalry face off across the Secchia in the north, von Waldeck attacks!  In a supported assault across the river, de Contades' infantry lining the banks are driven off.  More than driven off, that is, they are cut down where they stand. 
Cavalry standoff
von Waldeck's assault.
With much of the Austrian army across the Secchia and losses mounting as the King's Piedmontese begin to engage in an attempt to stem the tide, de Broglie realizes that discretion may be the better part of valor.  Orders quickly go out for the army to retire to the north behind the canal.  From there, a defensive line can be formed.  A sensible plan but the Austrians are applying too much pressure and the Allies continue suffering losses in retreat even before the canal can be crossed.  Orders are changed once again from defend the canal to general retreat.  This battle is over as the Allies attempt to disengage and live to fight another day.
de Broglie orders the army to fall back to the canal... 
turning into general retreat as losses mount.
The Austrian army presses forward...
with the enemy before in full retreat!
Piedmontese King and his cavalry look on.
Congratulations to Chris and Doug for a finely executed attack!  The Austrians managed to drive the Allies from the field.  To the Two Daves, you fought hard but fate did not smile on you this day.  The Butcher's Bill illustrates the lopsided casualty counts.
Austrian front line when the Allies disengage.
Butcher's Bill
While the result ended in an Allied defeat as in the Rejects' game, the battle developed and unfolded differently.  Much differently!  The Allies seemed unable to get their legs under them after the first attacks during the surprise turns.  From the historical accounts, this game probably reflected actual events more closely than the earlier game.  Still, I believe that the Allies hold a fighting chance as we saw in the Rejects' game.  Today, it was not to be.  How will this battle play out next time?  Well, we will see!  I have a few ideas on strategies to test out when I take up command.

Thanks for an entertaining and enjoyable contest, fellas!

36 comments:

  1. Another enjoyable game to participate in and an enjoyable AAR. This is the first time I've gamed anything from the War of Polish Succession. thanks Jon!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Chris! You played a great hand in this one! I have more WPS battles to refight and Quistello is still out on table.

      Delete
  2. I always enjoy the butcher's bill picture at the end of each AAR Jonathan. While it doesn't tell the whole story, in this case it looks quite decisive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Butcher's Bill tells the story in this fight quite clearly! The Allies were mauled early on and never regained their footing.

      Delete
  3. Great to see another fantastic battle report Jonathan!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Another excellent report and I agree with Lawrence re the Butchers Bill pics....very helpful as a summary of the game!
    It will be interesting to see if your cunning plans for the Allies can garner success in a future iteration of the battle, Jon ....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Keith! My plans seem sound in theory but rarely execute as expected in practice.

      Delete
  5. Another very interesting take on the game, an enjoyable read and a big win for the Austrians,as others have stated the Butcher's Bill photo at the end really illustrates the battle in a picture this time. Be interested in seeing the next take on the battle to see if it will play out any differently. Must admit very interested in seeing more War of the Polish Succession battles, really piqued my interest!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Donnie! The Butcher's Bill is quite jarring compared to the game with the Rejects. I am working on a couple more scenarios. One is set in WAS and the other in WPS.

      Delete
  6. A great game and report Jonathan. A tough one for the Allies with a very different for the Austrian initial attack to the previous game.
    It looks like if the Austrian initial attack scores big the Allies need to fall back to the canal immediately (possibly easier said than done) while if the initial attack is less successful a more forward defence is possible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you enjoyed the report, Ben! This is a tough battle for the Allies as it should be but victory conditions are set such that a win should be possible. Your thinking is along the same line as mine on winning this scenario as the Allies. Can I pull it off? Not likely with my luck!

      Delete
  7. The Austrian commanders certainly took the fight to the Allies and put them on the back foot in short order from which they were not given chance to recover. Very well played and a great narrative with supporting photos to relate it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Austrians certainly took the fight to the Allies, Phil! They never let up and kept pushing, pushing, pushing. Glad you enjoyed the report! Thanks!

      Delete
  8. The Austrians certainly exploited their initial attack and the allies weren't really able to respond, entertaining and lovely looking game!
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Austrians took advantage of the situation and drove their attacks home. The Allies had a difficult time responding. Glad you liked the game!

      Delete
  9. One of those games that start going in one direction and don't let up!
    Neil

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wow, that was one-sided. Great report.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It's cool to see how different players handle the same scenario and how much game there is in the scenario. If it played the same every time then I think that would be a poor one. 😁

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The real test is when players are willing to swap sides and replay the scenario to see the challenges the other side faced.

      Delete
  12. Thanks Jon, a great report of what was not my finest hour! Chris and Doug executed their attack faultlessly, and with de Contades brigade destroyed right at the start, we never really recovered. I would recommend future Allied players to make a very close reading of the victory conditions (which I admit I did not do!) in order to decide on their actions - they might be able to frustrate the attackers, but it's a tough call! Interesting game though, and thanks very much for inviting me to join in, and for your great setup and hosting, as ever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You’re welcome, David! Always a pleasure having you take a seat at the table. Finest hour or not finest hour, does not matter here. It was an enjoyable game to watch develop. You might try something different next time or not! Such are the vagaries of war. I think a refight with your quartet would be interesting to see.

      Delete
    2. I think we both kind of lost our composure a little after that disastrous start Dave, and weren't really sure whether we were standing and fighting south of the canal or retreating to form a new defensive position on its north side. It would be interesting to replay and see if we can do any better as the Austrians. Great game as always and I look forward to the next one!

      Delete
    3. Yeah, players can get forced into difficult decisions. Uncertainty on which approach to take can be disastrous. We ought to give the game another go when everyone is available.

      Delete
  13. Another enjoyable encounter and much different to the last game

    ReplyDelete
  14. A great game, very different to ours! But this is the kinda plan we hoped for. Unfortunately for us in our game, Steve threw that 10 and we didn't surprise the Aliies in the centre and our attack ground to a halt. I'd be very happy to play again and swap sides.
    Well done to all involved on a great game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, very different battle progression from your game. Steve managed to get de Contades’ position stabilized before being completely overrun in your game but David was not so fortunate.

      A replay would be intersecting to see what (if any) lessons have been learned from these two games.

      Delete
  15. Another fine game there Jon and with a very different outcome, in terms of losses etc. It all certainly seemed to move in favour of the Austrians, which works for me;)!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Steve! Yes, this game had a much different narrative than the first game.

      Delete
  16. Wow, the Austrians grabbed the initiative and never lost it! Another great game of this battle Jon. All congrats to you and the players.
    Best wishes, James

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, James! Much different development than in the first game.

      Delete
  17. These are really heavy losses for the French and there Allies. Great report as usual.

    ReplyDelete