| Attrition is harsh during the early stages of winter |
In Montcalm & Wolfe, winter is especially hard on troops. In addition to each turn's Supply Phase where units not on a Supply Source forage, winter has its own Attrition Phase. In winter, even stationed on a Supply Source is no guarantee of making it through winter. In winter, settlements can only exempt one non-militia from foraging while a fort or port can guarantee that two, non-militia units will not have to forage. Militia have a special demobilization roll where every militia must make this roll regardless of location.
With those preliminaries out of the way, how did the armies far during the 1756 Winter 1 Attrition Phase? The British Regulars marching out of Fort Stanwix were successful but one Regular in Fort Edward and one Regular in the Cumberland Wilderness succumbed to the ardors of winter foraging. No British militia demobilized. For the French, two militia demobilize and head back home. Those militia were garrisoned in Fort William-Henry and Quebec.
| Winter 2 Movements |
Battle of Fort William-Henry
OB:
British: Monckton (A2D1), 2 x 5-6 Regulars, 1 x 3-8 Ranger, and 1 x 3-5 Militia
French: Dieskau (A2D2), 2 x 5-6 Regulars
Can the French hold the fort or will it change hands once again?
12 comments:
Fort William-Henry is to be hotly contested again.
Once more unto the breach! Numbers will be with Monckton this time.
I'm catching up Jonathan (as you know). So pleased to see a campaign of the French and Indian War.
Peter's rule tweak might perhaps hold more certainty for a Garrison force this time around. I wonder whether Peter will be allocating artillery in this one?
Great to have you back and following the FIW campaign, James! Good to go back to the beginning of the campaign and begin anew. Don't forget to visit Peter's blog to see the tactical battle results.
It is always interesting to watch the battle unfold on Peter's game table. Will the defenders hold out this time? We will see! The French brought along a gun to the major battle when they took the fort. Perhaps that gun remained?
Montcalm and Wolfe? Nah, I think this version is William and Henry!
I think you are right!
Battle report posted.
Thanks! Numbers were with Monckton but not luck. Great report, Peter.
I was thinking the same thing as Peter. It is more the William & Henry war. An interesting development none the less. Is it an outcome of the game design, or does the map really give such strategic significance to this location?
To answer you question, yes, the game and map do give strategic significance to Fort William-Henry. Let me explain.
The two main avenues of approach into the others' sphere of influence is via either the Mohawk River or the Lake Champlain/Lake George/Hudson waterway. Tackling other routes can lead to high attrition in the wilderness as parties are forced to forage when not occupying a fort or settlement. A force unable to reach a supply source can literally disappear in the wilderness.
Post a Comment