Sunday, April 19, 2026

Lannes Is Still Dead

Last Monday, I wrangled Reject Lee and Reject Ray into taking their shot at the Montebello battle.  While Richard and I played the scenario twice in prior weeks, I was anxious to see how two new players would handle the situation.  If you recall, in my games with Richard, he wound up winning both battles despite us switching sides for game two.  Ray chose to command the attacking French leaving Lee to command the Austrian Army.  How would Ray and Lee fare?  Let's see!

As a reminder, the initial battlefield situation shows O'Reilly at Rivalta and Vogelsang at Montebello.  Schellenberg is on the march to Montebello from the west.  Elements of Lannes' command enter from the east along the highway.
Initial dispositions
View from the west looking east.
O'Reilly at Rivalta
Vogelsang at Montebello
Schellenberg on the march
Lannes' command
On to battle!
Watrin's Division arrives and moves on Rivalta.
French attack all along the front.
Austrian hussars are driven away to the north while 
two battalions of 22nd Line destroy grenz on the heights.
Following up on their success against the grenz, the 22nd
attacks the supported guns on the highway.
Roughed up in a lengthy firefight,
 the French are victorious and the enemy scattered. 
Austrian infantry in the rye north of Rivalta give way as well
but Austrian jaegers still hold firmly onto Rivalta.
The jaegers try to extricate themselves from Rivalta
but are caught before making it back to friendly lines.
Vogelsang orders his division to form up on the
heights to the south of Casteggio and in the town, itself. 
O'Reilly's command is broken but his hussars retire 
to reform and fight again another day.
Rivalta has already been cleared and O'Reilly is wrecked
 before Lannes and his command arrive on the battlefield.
Schellenberg arrives!
Victor and Chamberlhac arrive!
Vogelsang orders his division on reserve (red discs)
and awaits the attack he knows is coming.
Watrin has suffered losses in wrecking O'Reilly.
Still his division seemingly has plenty of fight left in it.
Even though pressing on is urgent,
Lannes makes a fateful decision.
Watrin is ordered to fall back while reinforcements come up.
Chamberlhac wastes no time.
Leading two battalions of light infantry, he attacks Casteggio.
Although the immediate foe is dispatched,
Austrians on the heights come out of reserve and counterattack.
With casualties heavy to both, the timely counterattack works!
Chamberlhac and his legere are driven back.
Seeing the repulse of Chamberlhac, Lannes leads a charge
into the Austrian guns in the rye to the north of Casteggio.
While the guns are overrun, Lannes' charge is met with
several volleys as the hussars enter the rye field.
Two units of hussars are cut down.
Lannes falls from his horse, dead. 
One remaining body of French hussars is attacked
 in a wave of charges from O'Reilly's hussars.
Lannes' third unit of hussars disintegrates.
Overview looking from west.
With all three of the French hussars destroyed and Lannes, himself, dead on the field, Lannes' command breaks.  Even though the French army has not reached its breaking point, Ray throws in the towel and admits that Lee has been victorious on this day.
View from Vogelsang's heights.
Congratulations, Lee, on a very fine victory.  You utilized reserve status effectively in some brilliant counterstrokes.  Ray, you put in a commendable fight.  I wonder if you could have pressed on with Watrin just a little more?  We will never no.
Attack on Casteggio halted.
As always, a most enjoyable contest.  On the Butcher's Bill, losses were distributed much more evenly than in the previous two outings.
Butcher's Bill
Ray and Lee, thank you for a very entertaining session.  Game duration was about three hours.  Afterwards, Lee said the game made his head hurt.  I hope that was a good thing!  And, yes, Lannes goes down a third time and he is still dead.

Next up, I try a four-player game of this battle.  Stay tuned to see how that goes.

56 comments:

  1. Great stuff once again Jon and congrats to Lee, winning with Austrians is no mean feat in my experience!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Keith! For the Austrians at this battle, it was definitely a case of quantity vs quality.

      Delete
  2. Another fascinating game. Look forward to seeing how the 4 player game pans out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you enjoyed the BatRep, Peter! A four-player game may require more than one session.

      Delete
  3. The French were overwhelmed. It was nice to see an Austrian victory. Well done Lee

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jonathan - what are the odds? I think you have jinxed poor Lannes!
    "Lannes is still dead" is a great name for a blog!
    Neil

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I think the dice have turned against Poor Lannes. That would be a good blog name. The title is a take on "And, Franco is still dead" from a SNL skit by Chevy Chase.

      Delete
  5. Fascinating battle and report Jonathan. Great work by Ray and Lee. I thought from the early attacks the French were on a winning streak.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Ben! Ray and Lee both fought long and hard. Very enjoyable watching try to gain the upper hand. I thought Ray would take control in this one after an impressive start.

      Delete
  6. Another interesting rerun of the game, enjoyable read Jon and be very interested in seeing how the 4 man game goes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The game was most interesting. Although O’Reilly gets overrun after a few turns as in the other games, Ray reached Casteggio sooner than in the previous outings. Thank you!

      Delete
  7. Another great looking game, Jonathan!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great encounter and well played by Ray and Lee

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that Lee and Ray played goods hands. As you can see below, Ray would play his hand differently next time.

      Delete
  9. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. There's a lot I'd do different if I played tbe French again. Lee seemed to have a lot of luck on when the troops moved, which really didn't help and his masterful use of the reserve rules, killed any attack mive I had.
    Did I just praise Lee's tactical knowledge....surely not???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hindsight is a wonderful thing, indeed! A rematch can be arranged. On first playing, the time and distance challenge is real. Operational tempo, maneuver, and decision-making are predicated on understanding this relationship. Only with repeated trials can these attributes be aligned to fulfill a goal. Now, praising Lee's tactical ability is an entirely different challenge. You may never hear the end of this!

      Delete
    2. Ray, did I just read correctly? or am I having an episode?!? 🤣

      Delete
  10. A well fought battle there, Wargaming at its finest.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great title for a post. The table looks particularly nice and interesting, I have just dug out my Premiérs Gloires (Early Glories) from Vae Victis to study the map and scenario details.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! I overlooked this title when drafting my scenario. Have you played this version of Montebello?

      Delete
    2. No - I have only played the Marengo game in the package.

      Delete
  12. Excellent report, Jonathan. I suspect that, at the beginning of the game, Ray forgot about the French's tactical flexibility to move fast.
    It's a tough task for the French. Plus, Lee certainly had initiative falling his way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Richard! Maneuver and combat superiority both favor the French. They must hit hard and fast and keep the pressure on. Something that I could not manage to do but you did!

      Delete
  13. I am thoroughly enjoying this scenario. It is a little different than the usual two lines facing each other across an open plane. Lannes never appears to have much luck, although he very much puts himself in harm's way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you are enjoying the scenario, Lawrence! Lannes has not yet learned his lesson.

      Delete
  14. A real "hammer and tongs" affair, by the looks of it. Based on the narrative, it seems that your rules system is quite good to be able to deliver such operational gradiations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In my humble opinion, I think the rules work very well. Each unit has three attributes (Fire, Melee, Morale) each of which has five possible grades. With those options, units can be built covering a wide assortment of capabilities. Different nationalities have different maneuver capabilities as well.

      Delete
  15. Nicely done as are all your battle reports.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Good gaming! It sounds like you’re looking at one of those more fluid Napoleonic engagements rather than the stereotypical “two neat lines and advance” situation. That tends to be where things get interesting—and messy! :o)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, this is more of a meeting engagement than a pitched battle.

      Delete
  17. This was a very good game on a lovely table! 👏👏👏

    ReplyDelete
  18. Another great game there Jon and nice to see an Austrian win:)! Note to self: do not name any commanders 'Lannes'...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Steve! The Austrian Army does not necessarily need to lose every battle. Lannes has had a rough time.

      Delete
  19. Another great game and nice to see an Austrian win, you need to take better care of Lannes, we need him in 1809!
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Iain! Yes, Lannes ought to be a lot more careful when leading from the front.

      Delete
  20. Excellent write up Jon. I was surprised when Ray threw in the towel. I had set my troops in the best defensive position I could, and he still managed to bite two great big chunks out of it! I wasn't feeling particularly secure but clearly neither were the French. I gladly took the victory, but I think there was more fight left in the French.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Lee! I thought the French still had a lot of fight left in them as well. After three hours of fighting, perhaps Ray was getting tired and willing to call it quits. Adjourning to come back and continue in a second session may have given Ray a fresh outlook. You played a good game so maybe the writing was on the wall.

      Delete
  21. Another great rendition of the battle Jon 👍

    ReplyDelete
  22. Nice BATREP Jon! Refighting historical battles is always my favourite tabletop activity- followed by reading other gamers' attempts at the same!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! Refighting tabletop historical battles is one of my favorite activities as well!

      Delete
  23. Maybe it's strange - but I actually now noticed the flags and I love the French flags of the period. So different from the later style. Thank you so much for focusing on that battle!

    ReplyDelete
  24. I’m in love with your basing… 12 figures plus a mounted officer looks fab!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you approve of my basing! I prefer single element basing for most of my gaming collections.

      Delete
  25. Lannes should perhaps lead from the rear. 3 outings and 3 times cut down makes it sound like he's not made for frontline duty?

    ReplyDelete