On Sunday, Matt (wargamesinthedungeon) and I met on the remote fields of Bassignana to witness the third playing of the battle. For those following earlier accounts, the ground should be well traveled. For those new to the battle, below is a photo of the battlefield showing initial troop dispositions and place names.
Initial dispositions |
French wing ready to step off. |
Spanish army poised for action. |
Matt's initial attacks and probes. |
De Gages' brigade reaches the Tanaro River. His cavalry cross and are immediately attacked by enemy cavalry. |
Unsupported, the rash Piedmontese cavalry are scattered. Not a good start for King Emanuele. Artillery at Rivarone causes casualties upon Arambou's infantry as it prepares to the cross the Tanaro. |
Battle view looking from the east. |
Maillebois' French brigades prepare to cross the Tanaro opposite Chiesa de San Germano and Montecastelle. The defenders await. |
In the center, de Montal attacks de la Chiesa's brigade at Rivarone. |
View of battle from southwest. |
Despite artillery bombardment from the heights above, de Montal's attack ejects the militia from Rivarone. The militia is dispersed. De la Chiesa goes down in battle, hors de combat. |
Flush with seeing success at taking Rivarone, Arambou assaults the guns at Rivarone. |
De la Chiesa's battery is overrun. The Piedmontese center has cracked! |
Against Chiesa de San Germano, de Grammont lines up two battalions on the banks of the Tanaro and fires into the defenders. The Piedmontese grenadiers are unmoved. |
Senneterre sends two battalions across the Tanaro in an assault against Montecastelle. The first attempt is bloodily repulsed. |
While the Piedmontese left and center crumbles, the right stands firm. |
On the Spanish wing, de Gages establishes a bridgehead across the Tanaro. |
de Gages forms up his infantry and blasts the light infantry in front of Bassignana. The light infantry melt away. Bassignana is undefended! |
With Rivarone in French hands, de Montal and Arambou prepare to press ahead, up the heights. |
In a concerted effort, de Montal and Arambou overwhelm de la Chiesa's last remaining battalion. With their general dead on the field, the Piedmontese scatter. |
Isolated, King Emanuele falls to the calamities of war. |
De Gages has a firm grip on Bassignana. |
As in the historical battle, the Piedmontese army was split and overwhelmed before Austrian reinforcements could intervene. Casualties were surprisingly evenly distributed with each side losing about a half-dozen units in the action. The Piedmontese army would withdraw back across the Po River as they did historically. This time, without their King!
Game length clocked in at about 2.5 hours and six turns played.
Still, great fun and another interesting outing at Bassignana!
Great to see this game again and a well deserved French victory, matching the hostorical outcome
ReplyDeleteNeil, I am glad you appreciate the replays. Another replay on the schedule for later this week. Matt did a commendable job on tearing apart my defense.
DeleteI think the replays are a great way of seeing how different players face the challenges of this battle
DeleteYou are exactly right!
DeleteSplendid looking game and you can't argue with the weight of history!
ReplyDeleteBest Iain
Thanks! Replicating the historical result on the gaming table always provides a sense of comfort.
DeleteAnother game where casualties might have been fairly even, but the outcome most certainly wasn't. Once again this shows there is much value in re-fighting a historical scenario, whether for fun or to understand the battle much more.
ReplyDeleteQuite right, Steve! We are in areement on the value and pleasure derived from repeat perfomances on the gaming table.
DeleteAnother entertaining run-through Jonathan and 2.5 hours seems like a quick and manageable session.
ReplyDeleteGlad you enjoyed the report, Lawrence! The game played quickly with the rules almost nvere getting in the way of tactics or strategy. I think the rules are in a good place. Perhaps time to codify them beyond a QRS and write them up?
DeleteI like the ‘spectacle’ birds eye view that your remote camera captured, a real feel of battle. Are your river sections new pieces - very tidy with two tone banking.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Norm! The overhead photos are captured by my handheld camera. I will go back and include a webcam screenshot for comparison.
DeleteThe rivers, I have had for ages. They were part of a Kickstarter years ago.
The iPad screenshot shows Matt had a very fine perspective of the battle from his remote position.
DeleteYour own birds-eye views are, well more birds-eye and I enjoy that for this sized battle.
I try to provide a webcam view from over and behind each player’s side of the table. That way, we can almost suspend the disbelief that we all are not in the same room.
DeleteAnother fantastic looking battle Jonathan!
ReplyDeleteBest regards
Glad you liked it!
DeleteAnother cracking good game delivered Jonathan!
ReplyDeleteChristopher
Thanks! Even in defeat, it was a most fun game session, for sure.
DeleteWhat an amazing batrep Jonathan. Playing such a games regardless of the result is reward itself!
ReplyDeleteCheers, Ross
Thank you, Ross! I enjoy the games, for sure. Very nice to have others willing to Zoom in for a game!
DeleteGreat game! Terrific that these games have so much replayability (if that's a word). As people have said, there is something very satisfying about mirroring history too. I confess I was rooting for the French for the entirely trivial reason that they have so many of my flags! ;-)
ReplyDeleteCheers,
David.
Thanks! With the correct mix of rules, scenario design, and just the right amount of luck, most games can have rewarding replayability. That is a word!
DeleteOn rooting for the French, well, you may step into a command when your schedule permits. Oh, my "Spanish" carry your French flags too!
Hey, when you’re not umpiring game for a bunch of people you able to take lots of photos. And they are swell. Great looking battlefield; the troops and the buildings especially. ๐
ReplyDeleteHave you ever tried black labels (with white words) like they recommend in Fire and Fury? I find they fade out a little better than the white ones.
Matt, is less demanding than having five or six players trying to be heard over the din of battle. That gives me s as little extra time to snap a photo or too. Umpiring multiplayer battles is quite fun too.
DeleteOn printing labels, I am a bit too frugal perhaps. Printing white on black consumes a lot of ink. My printer already uses more I think it should.
Jon a splendid battle and I can now go back and read the previous reports to see how they compare. The collection and the battle is beautifully set up and although a victory the balance of the victory conditions make it a really tough nut to crack. Not for now but I do wonder if there is a better defence line ? Perhaps not given the numbers that are pushing across the river. Could your cavalry have played a bigger role rather than pulling back ? Thanks again very enjoyable ๐
ReplyDeleteGlad you enjoyed the contest, Matt! You did not read the prior battle accounts beforehand? That is a good way to not be influenced by what others did before.
DeleteWhat about Liguane is a good question. After our battle, I wondered what would have been different if Liguane (with his small cavalry brigade) stayed to fight rather than scurrying off to protect Bassignana? If Liguane stays to fight, he runs a very real risk of breaking his two unit brigade. That would spell disaster since de la Chiesa cannot maintain his postion in the center. Also, keeping Liguane on the right flank opens the way to Bassignana and the crucial pontoon bridge over the Po. If the Austrians do arrive in a timely manner, the Piedmontese could lose the bridge and their avenue of relief. I certainly did not use Liguane in a useful way in this battle. I need to do better next time.
Consider a better line defense? Hmm. Where would that be?
Another excellent report, Matt and I are hoping to meet up again next month.
ReplyDeleteThanks! With Matt retiring very soon, the gaming possibilities open up. Maybe, one day, you will be interested in a remote game with you facing Matt over the remote tabletop??
DeleteSeems as if the Franco-Spanish always managed to have local superiority, bringing several units vs each individual Piedmontese defender. Hard to come out on top without the means (or a few good die rolls!) to disrupt the coordination that requires.
ReplyDeleteWith the Franco-Spanish holding about a 2:1 advantage, it is tough not to maneuver to yield local superiority! Matt did a great job in ensuring he did so. I did not play at my best and see opportunities for improvement. Next time. Yeah, I'll get him next time.
DeleteA great game, even if you lost Jon! I may be wrong, but seemed like Matt produced the most one sided result of all games played to date? Could this reflect the advantage of a unified command (one player making all the decisions) over multi player games?
ReplyDeleteKeith, does it matter who wins or loses? What matters is how we play the game! Matt played better than I and the Piedmontese fell in defeat.
DeleteYou make an interesting observation about single vs multiple commanders. Having mutliple commanders does introduce some added friction into the game. Situations difficult to replicate in a one on one game seem commonplace when multiple commanders are making decisions on both sides of the table.
Game #1 that ended in a Franco-Spanish victory saw more casualties on both sides with the Spanish controlling the bridgehead on the south bank of the Po. In this game (Game #3), Matt did a terrific job of pinning D'Aix' brigade in place while cutting through the Piedmontese center and left.
I classify both Games #1 and #3 as equallying the historical result. That is, if we ignore the fact that Matt took Piedmont out of the war by killing King Emanuele!
Agree completely Jon win/loss is irrelevant, I would question if I ‘played better’ but I certainly rolled two 1’s when needed to kill off de C and the King ๐
DeleteExcellent stuff! Looks like a tough ask for the Piedmontese. well done Matt.
ReplyDeleteThanks! Yes, the situation may be tough for the Piedmontese but the historical situation was too. From Game #2, we can see that the Piedmontese are not without options and opportunities as they came out victorious in the second contest.
DeleteOn Thursday, Peter takes a swing at commanding the Franco-Spanish armies.
Brilliant and engaging report Jonathan. Sounds like a good time was had by all.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Richard! Glad you enjoyed the battle account. It was a good game, for sure.
DeleteExcellent battle. But how many bad luck could the Savoy army have? Poor king of Savoy defeated and captured in the end.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Andrรฉ! Yes, the Piedmontese saw some bad luck luck including the loss of their King. C'est la guerre.
DeleteA great looking game, and better luck next time, Jon!
ReplyDeleteThanks! My opportunity to tackle the battle again comes up on Thursday.
DeleteWhat a splendid looking game, super table and toys and 2.5 hours of enjoyment. Just what makes this hobby first rate.
ReplyDeleteMuch appreciated, Phil! This was a good day at the gaming table with a good opponent.
DeleteOh come on, Best 3 out of 5! You know you want to....
ReplyDeleteLooks good and reads like an engageing game. What more can we ask?
Thanks, Ross! By time I am finished with Bassignana, five games looks very likely. Game #4 is scheduled for Thursday.
DeleteAh, "The guns at Rivarone", I remember that film!
ReplyDeleteThat was a steady, grinding French victory. Aside from the initial cavalry charge it all seemed to go pretty well and them steamrolled the opposition in a slow, steady early 18th C manner!
Regards, James
Guns of Rivarone
DeleteI know! I thought that was a good one! Yes, I was slowly and steadily steamrollered. Not a way in which I wish a battle to develop.