Pages

Sunday, December 7, 2025

A Trio of Recent Games

Since hosting my last game on 17 NOV in a two-player remote game of Zallaqah (see Zallaqah Round 3), my gaming table has been dormant.  Well, the armies of Zallaqah are still positioned for battle but no renewed fighting yet.

Instead, I have had the pleasure of playing in three games in the intervening three weeks.  Two of the games were played remotely in two-player games and the third was a F2F game with five players.

To recap:
23 NOV AWI Campaign Continues
In our multi-year campaign of fighting our way through the AWI in miniature using Rebels & Patriots and Matt's superb 28mm collection, Matt presented the Battle of the Clouds as our next action.  This is an action to which I had no knowledge.  Evidently this skirmish and running battle occurred following the Battle of Brandywine.  The American goal is to get their supply train across the table and exit intact at Point A in photo below.  The British goal is to prevent such exit.  Oh, and a huge deluge is expected!
Positions at start
The Americans suffer through a series of failed activations before finally seeing some steady movement of the wagon train.  One wagon makes it off moments before British light infantry overrun the American artillery piece that deployed to protect the exit point.  Good progress continues until the rain begins to fall.  Then, wagon progress slows as the roads become clogged with mud.  Washington moves his column up to slow the British advance to buy time for the wagon train.  Casualties pile up on both sides of the ledger as musketry rings out.  Then, the heavens open up and rain falls in buckets.  With powder wet, the complexion of the battle shifts to one of hand-to-hand fighting.  Washington holds off the Redcoats until the final wagon exits the table.  A Rebel victory...or was it?  Matt could have attacked the final wagon before it left the table to secure victory.  Instead, he focused his energy on attacking Washington.  He wanted the glory of taking Washington dead or alive!  I suspect he went easy on me.  See Matt's battle account at Battle of the Clouds.    
Washington and his boys get off to a slow start...
but in the end, make good their escape!
28 NOV Age of Sail
Next up was a nifty age of sail game with Peter and another one of his products of rules' tinkering.  Rules are entitled, Decks of Glory and are played on a hex grid with his homemade sailing ships.  Marvelous little models.

The rules were easy to pick up and all random decision points are resolved with a card deck.  Play was fast.  We got in three different scenarios in our remote gaming session.  The first scenario saw a one-on-one single ship, introductory engagement.  I came out on top in that one.  For scenario two, I commanded a single ship trying to escape a three-ship squadron.  I was caught and surrounded before exiting the board and struck my colors.  In Game #3, we fought a three-on-three squadron action.  I managed to come out on top here again.  Fun games and two out of three ain't bad!  Hope to give these a try again.  See Peter's battle account at Remote Napoleonic Naval Game.
Action is getting hot!
06 DEC Madhist Wars
Finishing off the last of the three games, Saturday saw me join five guys for a five-player battle in the Sudan using Battles for Empires II.  I was one of two British players facing off against three Madhist players.  Terry umpired.  Outnumbered by more than two-to-one to begin, the brunt of the native attacks fell upon my wing.  No sooner had an enemy unit or two been scattered but more popped up to fill in the gaps.  Dead Madhists were continually recycled back into the game.  This was about a four-hour battle ending in a British victory.  A slim victory, I reckon, since my wing was almost completely destroyed in the action.
Madhists look on.
Lining the ridge, my command shifts reserves
 quickly to my exposed left flank.
The enemy approaches...
and closes in ferocious fighting.
This was Game #3 for me with Battle for Empire rules.  I now have a copy that I can read through and reference for any future action to which I may be invited.  Bloody rules.  Very bloody.

This week, a double header with Matt is on the docket as we return to AWI.  Should be fun.

30 comments:

  1. Busy times Jon, fair getting the games in, and more to come this week! Very nice looking games all of them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Easier to get in multiple games when another is hosting.

      Delete
  2. Fun, filled, friends. A good week.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great stuff Jon - hard to believe you have not put on a game since 17 Mov - that must be the biggest gap in the last few years (or, at least, it seems that way) The trio of games you played all look a lot of fun. Looking forward to seeing more AWI with Matt soon too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! Three weeks since hosting a game is unusual. Juggling multiple schedules to set a date for multi-player games is becoming increasingly challenging especially during the holiday season.

      Delete
  4. A good mix of games there Jon and nice to see you able to get a FtF one in as well:).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quite a varied mix, for sure. A Saturday morning F2F game is becoming somewhat of a regular event.

      Delete
  5. A great variety of games there Jonathan, especially off the back of Zallaqah. The naval rules sounded fun from the brief description you gave.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Peter’s age of sale rules were fun and worked quite well. We discussed some amendments post game.

      Delete
  6. Nice reports. I played a few games using Battles for Empire and I thought they were rather good. I've still got the rules but I sold my colonial stuff years ago as it wasn't getting much use.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you approve! The remote game reports are only tasters since both Matt and Peter provide more detail of the actions and better photos on their blog write-ups. Still getting to grips with BoE2. The author, Chris Leach, is still answering questions and providing clarifications to our group as we work through the rules.

      Delete
  7. Good to see some face to face gaming Jon all that screen time can be bad. All set for this week 👍

    ReplyDelete
  8. That’s a lot of games in a short time! Good to see Airfix Arabs (and other ancient figures) on the table.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Two of these periods I rarely see on the table. I should consider bringing my only remaining colonial collection to the table sometime.

      Delete
  9. Fine looking games under the belt there Jonathan and you didn't have to run them which must be a bonus?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All three were good games, indeed. I enjoy running games but a break is welcome.

      Delete
  10. Three great looking and sounding games... you lucky chap!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All were good fun, Richard! Ready for another two-player contest?

      Delete
  11. A good mix of subject and a good run at gaming before the Christmas festivities start to disrupt play routine. I always like reading yours and Matt’s AWI game reports.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My account of the AWI battle is brief and meant as a teaser to go to Matt’s battle account which presents camera rather than screenshot images. Some gaming slows during the holidays while other gaming picks up. What will this holiday season hold?

      Delete
  12. Three cracking games to keep you busy

    ReplyDelete
  13. Great looking games, sounds like tons of fun, Matt went easy on you and clearly lacks a killer instinct! Would've been nicely cinematic if he'd caught Washington!
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The game were good fun and I got to add two new rules to my repertoire. Yeah, Matt thought it would be very cinematic to take out Washington.

      Delete
  14. Three games in three weeks seems pretty good to me..
    What are your impressions of Rebels and Patriots?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pretty good, for sure, but I am slowing down a bit in old age.

      R&P is a good game but attacking is hard, skirmishers overpowered, and artillery game changers. I reckon if you keep the points totals as suggested at about 24 points each, attacking offers little chance for success. We tend to have 2:1 or better for the attackers to make a decent game. Tactical nuance is at a minimum too but YMMV.

      Delete