Pages

Sunday, July 11, 2021

Grenadiers Flat-Out Through Flatbush Pass

The Americans Await...
Photo courtesy wargamesinthedungeon

In the second piece of the Battle of Long Island to hit Matt's gaming table, today's action sees von Heister's Germans attacking through Flatbush Pass in the center of the American defenses.  For a geographical reminder, the territory covered by today's battle is highlighted in yellow.

Battle of Long Island
Tactically, the battle looks like this:
Initial dispositions
Since Matt published a well-told and comprehensive battle report with terrific photos (see: Battle of Long Island: AWI von Heister Attacks), I have not much to add.  My report-out focuses primarily on the attack of the Hessian grenadiers.  Matt commanded von Heister while I took command of the Americans under Sullivan.
The American defenders await the impending attack
But wait! Where did I place that box of smoke markers?  
Found it!  Fire away boys!
Fire erupts along the line.
The British and Germans begin their attack
Volleys are exchanged as the enemy advances.
Looks like the enemy is massing
 for an attack upon the left.
The grenadiers climb the slope and attack Sullivan!
In the first clash, the Americans are driven back.
The Hessians follow-up!
Whoa-ho!  An attack worked!
Better get a photo of this!
In the follow-up, Sullivan is forced to retire again.
The grenadiers keep up the pressure on Sullivan
 but fall short of closing.
View from the other side.
Caught in the open,
the grenadiers receive fire from all directions.
Artillery and jaegers offer support through fire.
Enemy fire is devastating
 on the regiment behind the abatis.
It breaks for the safety of the fort.
The Anglo-German advance continues
but the grenadiers' charge comes up short again.
Whew!
Only delaying the inevitable. 
 The grenadiers crash into Sullivan.
Sullivan is sent packing.
Back to the safety of the fort.
v Heister presses on as the Americans fall back in defeat.
Quick! Open the gates to the fort!
Von Heister takes Flatbush Pass.  Beyond, he sees the fortifications on Brooklyn Heights.  Where is General Howe?
Sullivan last seen heading back to Brooklyn
with grenadiers in hot pursuit.
Photo courtesy wargamesinthedungeon
This was quite a fun and tense game.  At first, I thought the British would witness another defeat on the attack.  How wrong early indications were.  After some poorly timed American morale failures coupled with well-timed German attacks, Sullivan's position dissolved.  Convincing victory for Matt at the helm of the Anglo-German force.  The final Honor Points tallied at 11 to 7 to von Heister.  Note that Matt's freshly commissioned Hessians performed brilliantly in their first action.

Well done to Matt for both hosting the game (beautiful is it not?) and for his resounding victory.  What is next in the campaign?

56 comments:

  1. Superb spectacle sir!
    Great looking game and figures, and fantastic action.
    Great to see the context too via the map. I must look at doing this scenario in some form.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Darren! The spectacularity of the battle all rests on Matt's shoulders. He always put together an exemplary gaming table. I can only hope to make such a presentation. I guess I am more of a minimalist...

      Give the scenario a try sometime. I can provide OB and Victory Conditions if needed.

      Delete
    2. yep - thanks Jonathan. I would certainly be interested in trying it. ducdegobin (at) gmail (dot) com - if you could send the OB and VCs

      Delete
    3. Let me clean it up a bit snd then I will send it on.

      Delete
  2. Yes, a fine table and nice to see that it gave both sides ‘a good game’. One of the the things that seem to fall out of a remote game due to practical space limitations is that a proper conclusion is typically reached …… unlike many face-to-face games.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Both sides received fair shots at victory or defeat. Unfortunately, my rebels came up short this time.

      Good point about reaching conclusions in remote games. Is that because we are tackling smaller scenarios, using more streamlined rules, or simply less kibitzing during the game?

      Delete
    2. I would say the smaller scenario / playing area drives that, but perhaps there is a greater emphasis or reliance on at least one of the participants have a really good grasp of the rules.

      Delete
    3. Having the host know the rules very well and playing with confidence could be the #1 rule for remote play. The host really needs to know what he is doing to keep the game moving along without dead time for the players. There is little time for fumbling around in a remote game.

      Delete
  3. Sounds like Matt had some luck on his side thus time, with the Grenadiers failing to charge home a couple of times, yet still being able to carry on and eventually succeed. Great report Jon and I will go and read Matts version later today as I need to go to work now...unfortunately!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matt had some good luck and I had some bad luck. Still, I think the Rebels could win this with just a bit more luck. Matt's grenadiers broke through my line successfully on the first attack. It was the follow-up attacks where his grenadiers failed to make contact. I simply outran him!

      Thanks for your encouragement, Keith!

      Delete
  4. A great game, both visually and in the scenario design. Ignoring the 24 pts a side is working out really well, with the increase for the Attacker in points terms helping, but not too much. Good to read your view of the game after Matt's AAR:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Steve! After the first few games of R&P, we have pretty much abandoned the notion of a hard 24 point limit since we are wanting to field larger armies for larger engagements.

      This action saw 52 points for Anglo-Germans and 32 points for the Americans. Still, that is not too many forces to put on the table and R&P seems to scale up or down easily.

      Delete
  5. Fantastic AAR with splendid images.
    Does your campaign have economic? I mean can battle results impact troops force or give any other advantages/disadvantages for the next game?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Dmitry! Matt gets all credit for the presentation.

      When we first began playing this series of AWI campaigns, we did include a progression for leaders. That has fallen by the wayside and we are on task for recreating more historical battles and not focusing on leader careers or advancement. That is a good question.

      Delete
  6. Another great-looking collaboration. I like the teddy-bear fur surface and purchased a couple myself from ESR, and it seems perfect for AWI. It looks like Matt may have trimmed his a bit so the figures sit nicely on it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! I like the look of Matt's ground cover too. Never tried it, myself. The figures do stand up properly which on some of these ground coverings, that is not easily accomplished. Matt's tables are works of art to me.

      Delete
  7. A lovely looking game and interesting action. You have played a few games with these rules and they seem to give an entertaining game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed, Peter! We have played more games of Rebels & Patriots than I can easily count. I guess I could go back and count them but I think more than a dozen.

      The rules are quick to pick up and very little to look up during a game. Fast play too.

      Delete
  8. Nice looking game and good to see the right side win for once, they just needed some German efficiency!
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right side win? C’mon, man! Actually, I am very happy to see Matt and his newly painted Hessians have success with an assault upon prepared defenses. His grenadiers fought like I expect Grenadiers to fight. Crank up enough points and the sky limit!

      Delete
  9. Thanks Jon a splendid battle. As we know it could easily have gone the other way. I will work up the next scenario. Interestingly the quality of the picture from both cameras is about the same when you take screen shots. I do wonder if it can be sharpened without significant expenditure ? The challenge may then become bandwidth ? But it seems workable 👍

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I look forward to the next game in this trilogy! This was a fun game and could have tipped the other way, for sure.

      You webcam views via my iPad look good to me. What are you thinking of doing to sharpen the image?

      Delete
    2. For AWI buffs like yourselves....the guys at Little Wars TV are running a poll on their website to vote for one of three possible plans for their upcoming refight of Brandywine....which I have organised once many years ago and is one of my favourite AWI battles....I voted for the traditional left hook attack but there are two alternative options!

      Delete
  10. Beautiful job on an unusual subject. The early NY battles proved disastrous for the Americans and yet are tactically interesting. Might Manhattan skirmishes with Ewald's jagers be in the future?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Joe! I will need to investigate your scenario suggestion.

      Delete
  11. Great looking R&P AWI game Jonathan!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The game presentation is all of Matt’s work. Brilliant work, it is, too.

      Delete
  12. Newly painted AND they won!!!??? Unheard of! :)

    Loved that the right side won for once!

    ReplyDelete
  13. A splendid looking and sounding game Jonathan…

    All the best. Aly

    ReplyDelete
  14. Splendid game and must concur in Matt's table set ups. The "balance" re. attacker v defender in R&P looks to have hit the spot. Matt's Hessians must be being paid well or on time at least🙂

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. After a number of games, we realize that attackers need to out-point the defenders significantly to have much of a chance at winning. Attacks against a defensive position is difficult in R&P.

      Delete
  15. I'm a grenadier (in the reenactment) and love them pursuing the enemy.
    But to be earnest I'm very happy that you are writing a lot of reports to read especially when I don't have a chance to play myself. Great stuff as always!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Andrè! Happy to produce something entertaining for you while you are not gaming.

      Delete
  16. Nice report and pics. I might have to try some of these with Honours of War.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, George! I have not tried hoW for AWI yet. Have you?

      Delete
  17. Thanks Jonathan, you and Matt tell a great story between you. I rally appreciate the info you add to your photos (arrows, etc) making it easier to understand the action. Also nice to see what at least one of you two looks like!
    Cheers, Mike P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are welcome, Michael! These remote games with Matt have been an enjoyable experience. Plenty of AWI to work our way through. Adding arrows helps me too and I was there!

      Delete
  18. Looks like a great game and from recollection, a rare win for the Anglo-allies

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You recall correctly. First British win in this series in a very long time.

      Delete
  19. Reading about the same battle on two blogs definitely provides a sense of deja vu. But in a good way.
    I enjoyed the pics of Matt during the game; kinda like a backstage access / behind the scenes look. 😀

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good to see that we pulled off the report duplication in a good way! I think we each see the battle progression in slightly different ways with different motivations to creating our narratives.

      Delete
  20. A outstanding report on a most excellent game. Amazing terrain and figures. Thus must have been a first class experience to play in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First class experience all of the way! Thanks for dropping by, Mark.

      Delete
  21. Even with the screenshot photos, it looks great, and I suppose the Americans were due for a defeat.

    ReplyDelete