Time to wrap up the series of Salem Church refights on the gaming table with one more battle report. Today's installment features Game #6 in this long-running test of endurance. Recollections are from my 27 October remote battle with Peter. His account of battle can be found at Battle of Salem Church 1863 - Remote Game. Peter's battle account is a good one. So good that I almost did not write my account. Almost!
![]() |
| Initial dispositions |
![]() |
| Armies drawn up for battle looking from the northwest. |
![]() |
| Lots of Federals poised for action. |
![]() |
| On they come! |
![]() |
| First contact! |
![]() |
| Russell probes the tree line... |
![]() |
| and the Confederates respond! |
![]() |
| Reinforcing Bartlett. |
![]() |
| Brown coming under fire! |
![]() |
| Kershaw moves up! |
![]() |
| Bartlett comes under pressure. |
As Brown moves up to Williams Farm along the Orange Plank Road, he immediately come under fire from guns positioned in the woods south of the church. To the south, Kershaw senses the danger Wofford faces and sees an opportunity to pounce on Bartlett's exposed flank.
![]() |
| Browne leads an all-out attack on the Rebel Left. |
![]() |
| 61VA destroyed in initial attack... |
![]() |
| but 2RI is destroyed in pursuit! |
![]() |
| 17MA scatters 12VA... |
![]() |
| but is, itself, scattered when 16VA counterattacks! |
From following the action on the far left of the Federal line, attention turns to the action on the Federal far right. From the ravine holding Golin Run, Browne orders an all-out attack (yellow puff signifies all-out attack) against Mahone's Rebels lining the opposite bank. In the initial, supported attack, Browne leads the way into the enemy. Surprised, the 61VA is scattered in the initial onslaught. With enemy to its front gone, Browne wheels his 2RI left into the enemy lurking behind Perry Farm. Having already suffered great loss in clearing out the 61st, the 2RI is destroyed in this over-extended pursuit as the Rebels stand firm. Browne quickly joins the 17MA to lead them in an attack to avenge the loss of the Rhode Islanders. The 12VA boys are quickly dispatched but the enemy is coming up fast. Before the 17MA can regroup, out of the woods pounces the 16VA in a savage counterattack. Unable to mount a solid defense, the 17MA is destroyed. Browne's Brigade is wrecked. He calls off the attack to regroup.
![]() |
| 2NJ overruns Rebel guns... |
![]() |
| but is ejected from the woods only momentarily held. |
![]() |
| Federals move up in the center. |
With heavy righting to the north around Golin Run, there is no lull along the Orange Plank Road. Having scattered the Alabamans that were supporting the few Rebel guns north of the church, Brown sends the 2NJ in to clear out the guns. They do so with great gusto but are immediately counterattacked by Semmes' Georgians waiting silently in the woods. The 2NJ is forced back. Falling back in front of the 11AL who is still holding the church, the New Jersey boys come under additional fire. Sedgwick orders more of his Corps forward between the Orange Plank Road and Golin Run.
![]() |
| Russell attacks and is repulsed! |
![]() |
| Bartlett waits... |
![]() |
| while the Federal Center regroups. |
Seeing the setback at the church, Russell is ordered forward to break the enemy line. Those attacks go in and then go back out carrying heavy casualties behind them! Russell is repulsed and the Rebel line holds. With Russell driven off, Sedgwick figures it time to regroup and reform. Bartlett, on the Federal Left, puts his brigade on reserve to be ready for any Confederate attack out of the woods. In the center while Russell licks his wounds, Shaler is brought up to reinforce Brown. How long will this sector remain quiet?
![]() |
| Federal attacks at Salem Church! |
![]() |
| Confederate line is breached! |
![]() |
| Wofford counterattacks! |
Not long! Brown launches a three-pronged attack against the church. The Alabamans are ejected from both the church and the woods to the north. Wilcox' Brigade is wrecked! In an attempt to relieve pressure from Wilcox and the Rebel Center, Wofford attacks Bartlett. One Federal regiment is scattered, and a second is driven back. Bartlett's Brigade is wrecked! The balance stands at two Federal brigades (Bartlett and Browne) broken to a single Confederate brigade (Wilcox). Can the Rebels finish off one more Federal brigade to force Sedgwick to call it a day?
![]() |
| Browne attacks... |
![]() |
| and Mahone breaks! |
Not so fast!
Even though Browne's Brigade is wrecked, some regiments still have some fight in them. The 10MA and 36NY concentrate on the end of the Rebel line at Golin Run. The Rebels are dispatched and Mahone's Brigade is wrecked! Wheeling about, a second Rebel regiment is hit and seen off. The Confederate Left is turned!
![]() |
| Kershaw goes into action. |
![]() |
| Shaler crushes Semmes. |
![]() |
| View from Sedgwick's vantage point. |
Victory to Peter and the Federal Army! Congratulations and well done!
As the Butcher's Bill illustrates, my Confederate Army came out much worse for the wear than did Peter's Federal Army. Still, the game hung in the balance until the very end. We each had wrecked two enemy brigades before Peter wrecked Semmes to end the conflict. Even though I was up two brigades to one only moments before, I just could not muster the force to topple one more Federal brigade before Peter broke two of mine. I had Brown teetering on breaking with 3NJ needing only one more hit to break Brown's Brigade. So close!
![]() |
| Butcher's Bill |
Thank you, Peter, for another challenging and enjoyable contest. Maybe next time I can eke out a victory?
For Salem Church, there will be no next time. Time to stick a fork in this scenario and claim she is done. This was the Last Stand at Salem Church. With six games in the books, I plan to take some time to reflect on the scenario and these games. You all may be tired of reading about these battles at Salem Church, but I still have some thoughts to share as I wrap it all up in one more post.
As a non-binding and informal poll, did you read, skim, or skip this battle report?

































Another very closely fought battle, that once again went down to the wire, with the Butcher's Bill changing almost at the last it would seem. I think this shows how good a scenario you've created, given pretty much all the games have been too close to call until near the end. I look forward to reading your post games thoughts.
ReplyDeleteI tend to skim through the text and then read what happens at the end to see who won and possibly why etc. I may then go back and read it in more detail if I feel the need. Maybe it's just me, but I find it hard to follow the action as there is no overall view of the action from the same place at the end of each Turn, or on an apprpriate Turn. This would certainly help me and then some shots of where the action is important for that Turn, to help focus in on the detail as it were. I hope this makes sense?
Thank you, Steve! I hope that the narrative and photos provide enough context to follow but I will work on your suggestions for improving the battle report.
DeleteThat's been a terrific series of games Jon. At first it looks like the masses of Feds would just steamroller the Rebs, but the troops are not handily positioned so it balances things out.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Chris, that this has been a terrific half dozen looks at the Salem Church battle. I learned a lot and enjoyed each contest. Hope the players feel likewise.
DeleteI find the best things about you AARs Jonathan are the opening positions with the labels on the various formations, and the shot of the casualties and battle summary at the end. I tend to read both those bits in detail each time, and then quickly read through the narrative in between. I will then pause and potentially reread any highlights or turning points in between.
ReplyDeleteI have enjoyed the Salem Church scenario because, as I have commented before, it seems like an even one which has encouraged the various opponents to approached it in markedly different ways.
Thanks, Lawrence! Perhaps I should cut the battle report down to showing opening positions followed by the Butcher’s Bill? That would help my turn-around time immensely. I would lose the interesting narrative, though. These battles have produced some very tight games.
Delete"Six times ol Sedgewick has danced this way before,
ReplyDeleteSixth time was the charm he'll dance this way no more,
Cannon roared and muskets cracked, right across the field,
The battle swayed this way and that, neither side would yield,
Virginian boys and Georgians too, paid the price in blood,
Those Bluebellies swept them aside, like branches in a flood,
The butcher's bill was mighty high, among the woods so green,
Six times it's said, Salem Church has this battle seen,
At last the tables swept, woods once more made clean,
And now at last Salem Church, lies there all serene."
Six times at Salem Church - a poem (Anon)
Neil
You may have missed your calling as Poet Laureate, Neil.
DeleteI doubt it Jonathan, more William McGonagall......☺☺
DeleteI read it all the way through, then skim read it. I have to include something relevant to the report.....☺☺☺
Neil
To come up with your response, it was a good bet that you read the report.
DeleteThank you for a most enjoyable game. If you had rolled high at the start of your last turn you would have broken a third Union brigade and won.
ReplyDeleteIn response to your question - I am more likely to fully read battle reports when the photos have arrows showing movement or attacks. But I always skip to the end to get the result and then read through.
You are welcome! Facing you across the table in a large remote game was great fun for me too.
DeleteAnother hard fought battle in the series, they have been very enjoyable. I tend to skip to the end to see how the battle turns out and then go back and read and pore over the whole thing. I thoroughly enjoy your series of battle reports Jon, always well worth a read.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Donnie, much appreciated. Good to see how you read the BatRep.
DeleteI have to agree with Chris, this has been a great series of games Jon. I read every word from start to finish this time, but I don't always do that - sometimes, it depends on the day (and time of day) and how much time I have. I think your reports have just the right amount of detail although personally I find all the different commanders names a bit confusing - I would probably just say "Peter launches a three-pronged attack against the church." for example- but it's a minor thing and others may disagree!
ReplyDeleteThank you! Names can get confusing but in the spirit of an historical narrative, I tend toward using the historical commanders’ names. Point taken.
DeleteI just read through the whole thing and all the comments, Im a glutton clearly! I like the correct commanders names unlike Keith, even if Im not sure whos who but it works out in the end!
ReplyDeleteBest Iain
Thanks, Iain!
DeleteAs this was the sixth fight of this particular scenario, I read the beginning and end and skipped the middle bit. I read the others in more detail. I like extra effort you put in with arrows etc, it isn't something generally do. For ACW in particular I've started copying Archduke Piccolo and italicising the unit names of one side, as it can get very confusing when units are just referred to by their commanders names. It is easier when they are 1st Panzer Regiment or 8th Hussars. Less so when they are called 'Jones'.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Martin. Italicizing one army’s commanders. Interesting idea.
DeleteAs they say, "The most important thing is not to win but to take part"...
ReplyDeleteSomething to always keep in mind.
DeleteI did much like Martin and for the same reasons. I like your reports as you put arrows etc. on the photos to help make sense of the written narrative.
ReplyDeleteAlways advertise your triumphs and minimize the effects of your defeats. I am happy to see your arrows on the photos of the units in help the understanding of various xituations
DeleteThanks, Richard. Perhaps I should concentrate on being selective in my choice of battles to chronicle and how many iterations to share?
DeleteJoe, if I advertised my triumphs and minimized my defeats, I may have nothing much to say!
DeleteAnother tough run out for Salem Jon, I certainly couldn’t have played it six times good for you 👍 I’m a skim reader most of the time enjoying the visual treat of battles. If something peaks my interest I might go in further and read detail but most of the time not, my preference as you know is not to relive each game I play but keep a broad record for any future similar engagements. Each to their own 😀
ReplyDeleteThank you, Matt, for indulging me in two games! Both were very enjoyable. Six times for one battle may be too much especially since I was the foil in five of them. Since many seem to either skip or skim, I may follow your path and keep future BatReps to a bare minimum. I still enjoy recounting how the battle unfolds, though. These details would be lost in a brief summary and a few photos. Perhaps I ought to keep two sets of books on games played?
DeletePlaying six games of anything is a tough ask for me. I don't know how folks manage those multi-day tournaments like in Vegas, etc for Bolt Action and other systems. Not only would I be drained after the first three games on the first day, but a second round of that? No thanks. (Though I know your series is blissfully spread out over time.) Plus add to the fact of my Squirrel-like attention and I'd get bored quick I think. I leave it to far better men like your good self to replay a scenario so many times in a row.
ReplyDeleteI read it all. Did I take it all in though? That's the question. (And the answer is... no. Hence why I did so badly in school.) I did think you were going to take this game though until you didn't. It's a tough scenario but I think with the varied results played out here, either side can do it, if they are ran well enough.
Playing six games of the same battle might be a tough ask for anyone. Luckily with rotating players, the most any one player had to endure was two games. Even then Matt and I swapped sides in our game so we each got a different perspective of battle.
DeleteYou read it all? Great job! You are a model for the skippers and skimmers.
Another great close battle Jonathan. You were very unlucky not to scrape out a win.
ReplyDeleteI read the whole report each time, going back and forth if I am confused on anything. But I am a firm believer that you should write what and how you want, it is certainly what I do 😁
Everyone has a different style of writing AAR, some with a few photos and lots of text, some with a lot of photos and a bit of text (cough Keith cough 😁) and most with a balance in between. I enjoy them all and realise that the most important audience is the writer themselves as it is very unlikely anyone else will re-read them. I enjoy an annual read of my blog to see what I got up to in the past.
I do like the idea of italicizing one of the sides as this will make it easier to follow with minimal burden to the writer.
Thank you, Ben! Pleased to see another in the reader camp! You offer sound advice. That is, write how you wish. Maybe for clarity in ACW battle reports, I could put Confederate officers' names in gray and Federal officers' names in blue? I might try something like that next time.
DeleteColour coding the names is an excellent idea.
DeleteA splendid run of games it's interesting to see the different tactical approaches over the various games. As regards to reading I tend to follow the photos and skip read if the text is lengthy and then go back and read it fully if I feel it necessary.
ReplyDeleteGood to see you stuck with it through all six games! Yes, each was a little different as players tried different approaches to battle. Thanks for confirming how you read these reports.
DeleteAnother cracker in this series of games. A great read
ReplyDeleteThanks, Neil!
DeleteThat was a great finale to the series of re-fights of this battle Jon. Left the most intense to the last!
ReplyDeleteI generally take my time to read all of the text and view the pictures (usually in the smaller format on the post rather than 'zoomed'), which is why I get to a few blogs at a time. You caught me out a bit this time though. I read the first third, skim-read the middle and read the last; a bit like Phil.
Best wishes, James
Thank you, James, and good to hear from you!
DeleteA very fine AAR Jonathan!
ReplyDeleteThanks!
DeleteGreat stuff, I do like your massed ACW battles with loads of units on the table!
ReplyDeleteI will confess that by the 6th iteration I am 'skimming' the reports, and there is a slight problem with ACW games where it's not easy to remember which side any given brigadier belongs too since they are all 'English' names. The suggestion to show one side's commanders in italics is a very good one!
Thanks, DB! The names are easier to place when you are a participant, aren’t they? Happy you gave Game #6 a try.
DeleteReally good finale to the run of games
ReplyDeleteAll the best, Andy
I thought so too! Great way to end the series.
Delete